Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit TennisMom2's column >>

TENNISMOM2

Articles Posted: 1  Links Seeded: 21
Member Since: 7/2010  Last Seen: 5/08/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Now That's Rich

Seeded on Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:33 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: The New York Times
budget, politics, republicans, tax-cuts, wealthy
Seeded by TennisMom2
Advertise | AdChoices

What's at stake here? According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, making all of the Bush tax cuts permanent, as opposed to following the Obama proposal, would cost the federal government $680 billion in revenue over the next 10 years. For the sake of comparison, it took months of hard negotiations to get Congressional approval for a mere $26 billion in desperately needed aid to state and local governments.

And where would this $680 billion go? Nearly all of it would go to the richest 1 percent of Americans, people with incomes of more than $500,000 a year. But that's the least of it: the policy center's estimates say that the majority of the tax cuts would go to the richest one-tenth of 1 percent. Take a group of 1,000 randomly selected Americans, and pick the one with the highest income; he's going to get the majority of that group's tax break. And the average tax break for those lucky few — the poorest members of the group have annual incomes of more than $2 million, and the average member makes more than $7 million a year — would be $3 million over the course of the next decade.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • TennisMom2's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: NYTimes Forums Refugees, Obama Supporters
  • Regions: Washington DC, New York
  • Public Discussion (3)
TennisMom2

These numbers really pop to me, a middle-class person. When I hear about those with similar incomes and less praising the republicans and their desire to 'cut taxes for everyone' it just boggles my mind. Do people not take the time to arm themselves with information before giving blanket approval to a political party, the GOP, that has no interest in their welfare?

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Aug 24, 2010 1:36 AM EDT
Better Careful

Bush's tax cuts were written to expire in 10 years. There are laws that made it impossible to make them permanent, namely the law that you can't add to our deficit carelessly by not cutting spending when income is cut. Now, as voted on by the Republican majority and President, these tax cuts are due to expire. That's the law.

Republicans are more than welcome to propose new tax cuts for the rich. They can introduce a new law or amendment at any point. So far as I know, they haven't proposed any new amendment or law. What they have done, without doubt, is to demand that Democrats enact new tax cuts for the rich. They have demanded that Democrats to Republican dirty work, even though it's not something Democrats want to do. And they have smeared and derided the Democrats for not doing Republican dirty work, even though Republicans are refusing to do it themselves.

The Republicans are more than welcome, in an election year, to propose an amendment or law that suits them. Let them propose further tax cuts for the rich, and an increase in our debt/deficit. They are welcome to go there; I would enjoy it. I would prefer, however, that their stop insisting others do their dirty work for them, and then smear those others when they naturally decline to do so.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:49 AM EDT
TennisMom2

David Gregory was interviewing Mitch McConnell on this very subject on Sunday. Trying to get a straight answer out of McConnell was like trying to stop a merry-go-round with your foot. He danced, twitched and circumvented every question about this 'tax increase', which was how he referred to it. Gregory asked him why it's called a 'tax increase' if all that happens is the expiration of tax cuts. "Because it's a tax increase" McConnell would answer. "Yes, but why is it called that if the present taxes revert to 2001 levels", Gregory would ask. "Because it's a tax increase" was McConnell's answer.

OMG these GOP politicians are the evil incarnate.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:24 PM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com